Skip to content

What is the difference between ISO 27001 and SOC?


What is ISO 27001?

ISO 27001 is an international standard that provides a framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continuously improving an Information Security Management System (ISMS). It is designed to help organizations manage the security of their assets, such as financial information, employee details, and intellectual property, by assessing and addressing security risks. ISO 27001 sets out a systematic approach to managing sensitive company information, including risk management processes, the establishment of security objectives, and the implementation of security controls. By conforming to ISO 27001, organizations can demonstrate to customers, partners, and other stakeholders that they have implemented a robust and effective Information Security Management System. This certification plays a crucial role in fostering trust and confidence in an organization's ability to protect data and mitigate security risks.

What is SOC?

SOC, or Service Organization Control, is a collection of standards and audit reports that evaluate the competency of an organization's controls. It provides assurance to customers and stakeholders regarding the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of the organization's systems and data.

There are various types of SOC reports, with SOC 1 and SOC 2 being the most common. SOC 1 reports assess the internal controls of a service organization related to financial reporting. These reports are relevant for organizations that have an impact on the financial statements of their clients.

On the other hand, SOC 2 reports focus on data protection controls. They assess the operating effectiveness of the controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. SOC 2 reports are commonly used by organizations that provide services and handle sensitive or client data. These reports provide customers and stakeholders with valuable insights into the security and integrity of the organization's systems and data.

SOC 2 reports are based on criteria defined by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The assessment involves evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of the controls in place. The reports are conducted by an independent auditor who examines the organization's control environment, policies, procedures, and processes.

Similarities & differences between ISO 27001 & SOC

Both ISO 27001 and SOC (Service Organization Control) reports are relevant in the context of security management and controls. While ISO 27001 is an international standard that focuses on the establishment, implementation, monitoring, and improvement of an Information Security Management System (ISMS), SOC reports assess the effectiveness of a service organization's internal controls related to financial reporting (SOC 1) or data protection controls (SOC 2). Despite their shared goal of evaluating security measures, ISO 27001 and SOC reports differ in their scope, criteria, and audience. This article will explore the similarities and differences between these two frameworks to help organizations understand their applicability and benefits in strengthening their security posture.

Common goals

ISO 27001 (International Organization for Standardization) and SOC (System and Organization Controls) share common goals when it comes to information security. Both frameworks aim to address the critical aspect of information security, mitigate security risks, and ensure the effective implementation of proper controls.

By adhering to ISO 27001 and SOC, organizations can demonstrate their commitment to protecting sensitive information and maintaining the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. These compliance efforts not only instill trust in their customer base, but also help organizations prevent security breaches, mitigate potential risks, and respond effectively to information security incidents.

ISO 27001 provides a systematic approach to managing information security risks through a series of security processes, security objectives, and security policies. It includes risk assessments, access control, business continuity planning, and regular internal audits to evaluate the effectiveness of controls.

On the other hand, SOC reports provide a comprehensive attestation report from an independent auditor, typically a licensed CPA firm. This report assesses the design and operating effectiveness of controls relevant to the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of customer data. It is particularly important for organizations serving customers in North America and international clients seeking assurance over the effectiveness of controls and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Areas of focus

Both ISO 27001 and SOC have specific areas of focus when it comes to information security.

ISO 27001 places emphasis on developing and maintaining an Information Security Management System (ISMS). This includes identifying and assessing security risks, implementing controls to mitigate those risks, and regularly monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of these controls. Key security controls examined by ISO 27001 include access control, business continuity planning, risk assessment, and regular internal audits.

On the other hand, SOC reports offer flexibility for organizations to choose which Trust Services Principles they want to assess. These principles include security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. This allows organizations to focus on the areas that are most relevant to their business and their customers' needs. SOC reports provide an independent attestation report from a licensed CPA firm, offering assurance over the design and operating effectiveness of controls in these specific areas.

Certification processes and requirements

ISO 27001 and SOC certifications provide organizations with valuable assurance of their information security practices. While both certifications have similar goals of assessing security controls, they differ in their certification processes and outcomes.

The ISO 27001 certification process starts with an organization's readiness, involving internal assessments and gap analysis to identify areas for improvement. Once readiness is achieved, the organization can proceed with the formal certification audit conducted by an external auditor. This audit involves evaluating the organization's adherence to ISO 27001 requirements, including the development and maintenance of the Information Security Management System (ISMS). The certification is awarded if the organization can demonstrate effective implementation of security controls and a robust ISMS.

On the other hand, SOC certifications, specifically SOC 2, result in the issuance of an attestation report rather than a formal certification. The process begins with an organization undergoing a readiness assessment, similar to ISO 27001. Any identified areas for improvement will need to be addressed through remediation efforts. The assessment is then followed by a formal audit conducted by a licensed professional, evaluating the organization's controls in relation to the chosen Trust Services Principles (e.g., security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy). The attestation report summarizes the auditor's findings and provides assurance over the design and operating effectiveness of controls.

The duration of the certification process can vary depending on the organization's readiness and the complexity of its security measures. Factors that can impact the timeline include the organization's compliance with ISO 27001 requirements, the extent of internal assessments and remediation efforts, and the availability of auditors for the formal audit.

Security controls

ISO 27001 and SOC certifications both encompass a range of security controls that are crucial for protecting data and ensuring information security. These controls include various measures and practices designed to safeguard sensitive information.

In the case of ISO 27001, security controls are implemented as part of an organization's Information Security Management System (ISMS). These controls cover a wide array of areas, such as access control, data protection, incident management, business continuity, and security policies. The objective of these controls is to mitigate risks, prevent unauthorized access, and ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets.

SOC certifications, on the other hand, focus on the Trust Services Principles (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy). The security controls associated with SOC frameworks include measures such as access controls, firewalls, encryption, intrusion prevention systems, and security incident response processes. These controls aim to protect data from unauthorized access or disclosure, maintain system availability, ensure the accuracy and completeness of processing, and enable privacy protection.

Both ISO 27001 and SOC security controls contribute to an overall security framework by systematically addressing risks and implementing measures to protect information assets. By ensuring the implementation of these controls, organizations can mitigate security risks, maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, and demonstrate effective security practices to their clients, partners, and stakeholders.

Services offered by both standards

ISO 27001 and SOC offer valuable services to organizations in achieving information security and data protection.

ISO 27001 provides a comprehensive framework for implementing an Information Security Management System (ISMS). This service includes the development of security policies, processes, and controls that cover various areas such as access control, data protection, incident management, business continuity, and security objectives. A key benefit of ISO 27001 is its focus on risk management, enabling organizations to identify and mitigate potential security risks. It also provides a structured approach to continuous improvement, ensuring that security measures are regularly reviewed and updated.

SOC (System and Organization Controls) certifications focus on the Trust Services Principles, including security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. SOC services evaluate and attest to the effectiveness of an organization's internal controls related to these principles. It involves assessment of security controls such as access controls, firewalls, encryption, intrusion prevention systems, and incident response processes. SOC certifications are valuable for organizations as they demonstrate their commitment to protecting data from unauthorized access, maintaining system availability, ensuring accurate and complete processing, and safeguarding privacy.

Both ISO 27001 and SOC services help organizations in achieving information security and data protection by providing a framework for implementing and maintaining robust security controls, identifying and mitigating security risks, and ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. These services also enable organizations to demonstrate their commitment to security and gain trust from customers, partners, and regulatory entities.

North american regulations covered by both standards

Both ISO 27001 and SOC certifications are applicable in North America and help organizations ensure compliance with regulatory requirements in the region.

ISO 27001, an internationally recognized information security standard, provides a framework for establishing and maintaining an Information Security Management System (ISMS). While ISO 27001 does not specifically address North American regulations, it provides a robust foundation for organizations to meet legal and regulatory requirements related to information security. This includes compliance with various North American regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Canada and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States.

On the other hand, SOC certifications, particularly SOC 2 and SOC 3, are specifically designed to assess and report on an organization's controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. While not limited to North America, SOC reports can help organizations demonstrate compliance with North American regulations by evaluating and attesting to the effectiveness of their internal controls in these areas.

Specific North American regulations that can be addressed by both ISO 27001 and SOC certifications include HIPAA, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), and Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), among others. By complying with these regulations and obtaining ISO 27001 or SOC certifications, organizations can demonstrate their commitment to maintaining security, privacy, and regulatory compliance for their customers and stakeholders.

International standard covered by both standards

The international standard covered by both ISO 27001 and SOC is the framework for establishing and maintaining effective information security management systems (ISMS). ISO 27001 is an internationally recognized standard that sets guidelines for implementing a robust ISMS. It provides organizations with a structured approach to managing information security risks and ensures the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.

Similarly, SOC certifications, such as SOC 2 and SOC 3, also focus on assessing and reporting on an organization's controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. These certifications evaluate the effectiveness of an organization's internal controls and provide assurance to stakeholders that the organization has implemented adequate measures to protect data.

Both ISO 27001 and SOC certifications emphasize compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. ISO 27001 provides a foundation for organizations to meet various North American regulations, while SOC reports can help organizations demonstrate compliance by evaluating their internal control effectiveness in areas such as data security.

Advantages of implementing ISO 27001 & SOC

Implementing ISO 27001 and obtaining SOC certifications offer several advantages for organizations. Firstly, ISO 27001 provides a comprehensive and globally recognized framework for managing information security risks. By following the ISO 27001 standard, organizations can establish a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and managing security risks, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and compliance with relevant regulations. In addition, SOC certifications, such as SOC 2 and SOC 3, provide independent assurance to stakeholders that an organization has implemented effective internal controls to safeguard the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of data. These certifications not only enhance an organization's reputation and credibility but also help to gain the trust of potential clients and business partners. Moreover, implementing ISO 27001 and obtaining SOC certifications can help organizations withstand regulatory scrutiny, avoid potential fines, and demonstrate their commitment to protecting customer and organizational data. By adhering to these standards, organizations can proactively mitigate security risks, improve their overall security posture, and enhance their market competitiveness.

Data protection & security benefits

ISO 27001 and SOC (Service Organization Control) are two widely recognized standards in the field of data protection and security. Implementing these standards provides organizations with several benefits in terms of data protection, risk reduction, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

ISO 27001 is an international standard that helps organizations establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve their information security management systems. It provides a systematic framework for identifying, assessing, and mitigating security risks, including cyber attacks. By adopting ISO 27001, organizations can ensure robust security measures are in place to protect sensitive data from unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, and destruction.

SOC reports, on the other hand, are attestation reports that evaluate the controls in place at a service organization to protect customer data. These reports are conducted by independent auditors and provide assurance on the effectiveness of controls related to security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, and privacy. SOC reports help build customer trust by demonstrating that a service organization has implemented appropriate security measures to safeguard customer data.

By implementing ISO 27001 and obtaining SOC reports, organizations can mitigate the risk of cyber attacks and protect against potential data breaches. These standards provide a comprehensive approach to data protection, ensuring that security controls are in place to prevent unauthorized access and protect against threats. Additionally, ISO 27001 and SOC help organizations comply with regulatory requirements by establishing a formal framework for data protection and security practices.

Cost savings from automation of internal controls

Implementing ISO 27001 and SOC standards not only enhance information security and build customer trust, but they can also lead to significant cost savings through the automation of internal controls.

Automation can streamline compliance processes and reduce manual efforts by eliminating time-consuming and error-prone manual tasks. For example, instead of manually documenting and tracking access controls, organizations can implement automated systems that manage user permissions and access rights. This not only reduces the risk of human error but also saves time and resources.

Additionally, automating internal controls can result in cost savings in areas such as risk assessments. Traditional risk assessment processes can be resource-intensive, requiring manual data collection, analysis, and reporting. Automation can simplify this process by consolidating data from various sources and generating comprehensive risk assessment reports, reducing the time and effort required.

By automating security incident management, organizations can effectively respond to and mitigate security incidents, reducing the potential financial impact of data breaches. Automated incident response systems can detect and respond to security threats in real-time, minimizing the time it takes to identify and address security incidents, and reducing associated costs.

Increased confidence in compliance framework

Implementing ISO 27001 and SOC can significantly increase confidence in an organization's compliance framework. These standards provide a robust framework for managing and protecting sensitive information, ensuring that data security and privacy measures are effectively implemented and continuously improved upon.

ISO 27001 is an internationally recognized standard for information security management systems (ISMS). By implementing ISO 27001, organizations demonstrate their commitment to information security best practices and the protection of sensitive data. This standard provides a structured approach to identify, manage, and reduce security risks, ultimately increasing confidence in the organization's ability to safeguard data.

SOC (Service Organization Control) reports, on the other hand, provide additional assurance by evaluating the effectiveness of an organization's internal controls, including data security controls. SOC reports are conducted by independent auditors who assess various control areas, such as access control, business continuity, and vendor management programs. Obtaining a SOC report from a licensed CPA firm demonstrates the organization's adherence to recognized security standards, increasing confidence in its compliance framework.

Having an independent third-party audit and certification process, as offered by ISO 27001 and SOC, further enhances confidence in an organization's compliance framework. These audits provide an unbiased evaluation of the organization's security measures, identifying any gaps or weaknesses that need to be addressed. The certification process ensures that the organization has not only implemented the necessary security controls but also demonstrates ongoing compliance through regular surveillance audits. This independent validation gives stakeholders, including customers and potential clients, assurance that the organization's data security practices are reliable and trustworthy.

Challenges in implementing ISO 27001 & SOC

Implementing ISO 27001 and SOC (Service Organization Control) reports can present several challenges for organizations. One of the first hurdles is resource allocation. Implementing these security management systems requires significant time, money, and personnel, which may strain an organization's budget and resources.

Another challenge is the need for proper training and awareness among employees. ISO 27001 and SOC implementation often involve changes in security procedures and policies, and staff members must be educated on these updates to ensure compliance and avoid security risks.

The complexity of security controls is also a common obstacle. Both ISO 27001 and SOC require organizations to implement a wide range of security controls to mitigate risks effectively. This can be a challenging task, particularly for smaller organizations with limited IT resources and expertise.

Moreover, regulatory compliance can pose challenges during implementation. Organizations must align their security practices with relevant regulatory requirements, which can be time-consuming and complicated, especially when operating in multiple jurisdictions.

General thought leadership and news

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework: Best practices

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework: Best practices

When it comes to security compliance, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF) has built a reputation for effectively guiding organizations toward...

6clicks receives ISO 42001 certification for its AI Management System

6clicks receives ISO 42001 certification for its AI Management System

Melbourne, Australia – 18 November 2024. 6clicks, pioneer of the first AI-powered GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) software, is proud to...

Hailey’s newest updates: Risk & issue generation + compliance mapping

Hailey’s newest updates: Risk & issue generation + compliance mapping

At 6clicks, we’re continually evolving our AI capabilities to make the process of risk management and compliance faster, smarter, and more intuitive....

Understanding the NIST RMF: Breaking down the 7 key steps

Understanding the NIST RMF: Breaking down the 7 key steps

The NIST Risk Management Framework (NIST RMF) is a flexible framework that can be tailored to your specific organizational profile and regulatory...

Past, present, and future themes in cybersecurity: Are you keeping up?

Past, present, and future themes in cybersecurity: Are you keeping up?

In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, understanding where we've been, where we are, and where we're going is essential. By examining the...

Why 6clicks is outpacing legacy GRC platforms like Archer, ServiceNow and Diligent

Why 6clicks is outpacing legacy GRC platforms like Archer and more

For years, Archer, ServiceNow, and Diligent were the go-to names in GRC software. Archer’s rich functionality made it a leader, while ServiceNow’s IT...